b. 1
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing metronome marking in Atut proves that Chopin added it in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Metronome tempos , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The manner the mark is written in Atut makes it unclear whether the mark concerns the beginning of the piece or the beginning of bar 1, like it was interpreted in FE (→GE,EE). In the main text we adopt the second interpretation, since according to the most frequently applied rule, the marks are written in the place from which they are valid or slightly earlier. A dynamic mark after the bar line separating the upbeat can be found in Chopinesque autographs – cf. e.g. the Etude in A minor, op. 25, no. 4. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
||||||||
b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur in GE3 seems to be an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut, there is no raising the bottom note of the L.H. on the 3rd beat of the bar. This patent inaccuracy was corrected in FE (→GE,EE). There is a similar situation in bar 12. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE, cautionary naturals were added before g1 in the last chord in bar 6 and before the G-g octave in bar 7. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |